The only facts they could debunk would be the truly absurd (e.g. that this smoothie will extend your life by a decade!)
Or instances where insufficient evidence is used to draw an absolute conclusion.
I've seen them actually commit the latter where they fact check a politician's prediction based on an expert projection as if the expert is infallible.
Or instances where insufficient evidence is used to draw an absolute conclusion.
I've seen them actually commit the latter where they fact check a politician's prediction based on an expert projection as if the expert is infallible.