How can anyone in this day and age assume when someone speaks poorly of a massive, corrupt oganisation that they think highly of another massive, corrupt organisation?
Shouldn't we assume that everyone outside of those massive, corrupt organisations are tired of the status quo?
"How can anyone in this day and age assume when someone speaks poorly of a massive, corrupt oganisation that they think highly of another massive, corrupt organisation?"
I'd so love for this to be the case. Unfortunately that doesn't appear to be empirically true. There's a lot of political discussion just on HN that shows it's hard for people to grant the other side (whatever other happens to be) that benefit of the doubt. It does take work, though.
