I was actually referring more to the core routers with TCAM than home routers. A... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		exelius on May 11, 2015 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: HTTP/2 for TCP/IP Geeks I was actually referring more to the core routers with TCAM than home routers. And I agree, ignoring IPv6 isn't an option, but it is a viable option to encourage workarounds. Which is exactly what's happened; so most ISPs that support IPv6 do 6to4 tunneling at the edge.

harshreality on May 11, 2015 [–]

That's a workaround? Interior routers within the ISP don't need to hold the global routing table, so there's no real TCAM pressure on them, right?

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact