Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I'm making sure the same does not happen on Linux, before we get kicked out of our own platform.

To make one thing very clear: Sandboxing is partly intended to be an additional way to distribute software. Majority of the packages come from your distribution. This sandboxing (together with other bits) would allow you to distribute your application eventually 80% of the various Linux distribution users. I think it'll take some time because there's a lot of things to work out (e.g. relying on Wayland, kdbus, change Pulseaudio to use kdbus, etc).

A user should have control on what an application can do, but that's something new and user might highly prefer such applications (e.g. not allowing an application to just modify ~/.bashrc and adding some evil sudo alias if it feels like it).

IMO at most you'd have some package software which shows for VLC: "unrestricted access". The intention is to offer more security where possible to the user while at the same time it's not too difficult for the developer.



> To make one thing very clear: Sandboxing is partly intended to be an additional way to distribute software. Majority of the packages come from your distribution.

This is not what we understand from your GnomeOS talks and systemd "distributions are obsolete" posts.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: