Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That's a ridiculous argument by their CEO.

That is like saying Microsoft Office only holds a single digit percentage of revenue in the technology sector. It might technically be true, but it is irrelevant. MS Office has a monopolist hold on the office software space.

Monopolies aren't defined by someone who controls an entire sector (a "sector" is arbitrary anyway) it is when one specific company controls one commodity or service (see Google Search, which both the EU and US have called a monopoly).

Expedia absolutely has a monopoly on travel price comparison sites now. However it only becomes an antitrust complaint when they leverage that position into other markets (e.g. like Windows with Internet Explorer, or Google with Google+).

So while I don't think Expedia has broken any laws, yet. I will say that if they started using their newfound position for leverage I'd hope the US and EU governments stepped on them pretty fast.



Ridiculous, maybe, but it shows he knows exactly what he is doing, and it should be totally expected. Peter Thiel talked about this in Sam's startup class:

"...anyone who has a monopoly will pretend that they are in incredible competition ... The basic lie you tell as a monopoly is the market you’re in is much bigger than it looks."

- Lecture 5: Competition is For Losers http://startupclass.samaltman.com/courses/lec05/


"it is when one specific company controls one commodity or service"

There are plenty of office alternatives, including open office.

Here is a list of 10: http://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/best-microsoft-office...

Google also has competition: Bing, Yahoo, and Baidu to name a few.

"Expedia absolutely has a monopoly on travel price comparison sites now."

There are many other travel comparison sites. How can they possibly have a monopoly?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: