But you'd still be in defined territory. Once you let the canary send out its signal any conditions you attach after that fact contradict the signal by design and that is exactly the way it is not intended to work. You set it up with a set of rules and then you stick to those rules.
The intra-period but within defined parameters risk is a different one from the post canary has given its signal one.
The way I understand the whole system to work is that you set up a fragile, fusible link that will blow exactly once to give its signal, and any further signals are suspect. Otherwise why agree on a protocol to begin with if you can then break that protocol at will?
I can see a case for changing the protocol assuming the previous one was not broken but once you violate the protocol I can't see a way to un-do that without making the whole concept meaningless as a result.
The intra-period but within defined parameters risk is a different one from the post canary has given its signal one.
The way I understand the whole system to work is that you set up a fragile, fusible link that will blow exactly once to give its signal, and any further signals are suspect. Otherwise why agree on a protocol to begin with if you can then break that protocol at will?
I can see a case for changing the protocol assuming the previous one was not broken but once you violate the protocol I can't see a way to un-do that without making the whole concept meaningless as a result.