One thing the dynamic language (and Go, to some extent) comparison misses is speed: in general, Rust code is likely to be faster to execute than the equivalent Perl/Python/Ruby/Go, due to performance being a strong design choice of the language, and the use of the industrial strength LLVM optimiser.
This is a general statement, it's not always true; but the control Rust provides theoretically means one can always wrangle the Rust code to be equal to/faster than most other languages.
(In fact, the embeddability of Rust means it is pretty well suited to writing the parts of a Python/etc application that need performance, since Rust can easily make dynamic libraries which can be loaded as extension modules.)
This is a general statement, it's not always true; but the control Rust provides theoretically means one can always wrangle the Rust code to be equal to/faster than most other languages.
(In fact, the embeddability of Rust means it is pretty well suited to writing the parts of a Python/etc application that need performance, since Rust can easily make dynamic libraries which can be loaded as extension modules.)