Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

How do you protect yourself against bias caused by coincidence?


Well, in the first place I cannot. I take the thing as it is. This is the risk-taking part. But, I guess, that is why I have to move from correlation to causation or rather embed this one correlation into a broader context. Because it protects me against correlational flukes.

Thanks for this inspiring question.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: