Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
More things that don't make sense (newscientist.com)
42 points by thinkzig on Sept 8, 2009 | hide | past | favorite | 16 comments


Number 14: Why are intelligent people from serious news sites fooled into thinking newscientist.com is a reputable news source?


Supporting evidence: Homeopathy in 2005's list

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg18524911.600-13-things...


Do you mean us?


Of course not; Everyone knows we're well above that.


New Scientist fell prey to the N Things meme a couple of years ago - or I started noticing it a couple of years ago. Either way I wish they would concentrate on more pithy articles instead of these, sensationalist borderline crank science (insufficiently reviewed TOEs) and the dreary engagement with religion and philosophy.


I found The Bloop to be particularly interesting.

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327246.500-13-more-t...


The Bloop has always captured my imagination ever since I first heard of it years ago. I was delighted by The Slow Down as well! I love hearing and learning about strange undersea phenomena; that we have delved into space and still don't understand all of our own planet is a constant fascination of mine.


Cthulhu?


Magnetic monopoles don't seem rational. It would be like asking for something with only a front side, no back side.

Whereas a charge is something completely different. It's basically, a ratio of electrons to protons.


The math for them work. The English doesn't, because English has already embedded their atomic nature into the language. But the math works just fine; in fact it makes Maxwell's equations even more symmetrical.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobius_strip

There are plenty of problems with magnetic monopoles, but that was a particularly unfortunate choice of analogy.


re #11 (Existence of monopoles): http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/09/090903163725.ht... (second result on Google News)


good catch, but the fundamental question is magnetic monopole as an elementary particle.


I find several of these interesting: Dark flow, high-energy photons travelling more slowly, and the lack of gravitational waves are especially intriguing (moreso than the others for no particularly deep reason other than these are the ones I prefer to think about). However, the pop-science nature of the article is a bit annoying.


The segment about the bloop is worth the 'n things' pattern.


I was under the impression that Morgellon's was viral media for A Scanner Darkly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: