Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Can anyone give me an idea on what would happen if Ebola ever did get airborne?

I know that its high mortality rate is a massive curb on its ability to spread, but is that enough to put a dampener on spread if it became more easily transmittable?



I don't think that is a thing that is really in the realm of possibility. We should probably be more concerend about a strain of the flu becoming deadlier.


I wouldn't be so certain. Ebola can be transmitted between pigs and macaques via a respiratory path.

http://www.nature.com/srep/2012/121115/srep00811/full/srep00...


How would the world cope with a Spanish Flu like situation in 2014?


Empirically, the world in 2002 successfully dealt with exactly that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Severe_acute_respiratory_syndro...


Badly. We can't cut of international commerce, the world would starve. We can't cut of international travel, the world would starve and there would be a ton of riots.

If the outbreak is localized then we may have a change of putting a quarantine on the area, but I doubt it.


The good news is that there's a pretty good capacity to move massive amounts of goods with very little human interaction.

The bad news is that there's a hell of a lot of human movement, and you'd have to shut down much of that, as well as isolate carriers and exposed individuals as quickly as possible. Often in places (such as the present African outbreak) in which infrastructure, governance, and resources are exceptionally limited. The task of effectively controling all vectors would be a very high challenge.

I'd say it would be an ugly time, all told.


On the other hand, international commerce is largely mechanized in the age of container and bulk shipping and happens without much human contact.


I would assume that all first world countries have stored food/medicine/oil/etc. for emergencies. At least Finland keeps enough for six months consumption (was 12 previously, but with the current economic troubles it was dropped to 6 a few months ago). Of course that wouldn't include all the luxuries, but enough to keep people alive and the important industries running. And I suppose there would still be trade with countries that are known to be safe.


That would be an incorrect assumption in regards to the existence of medical stockpiles in all first world countries.

For example the closest thing to a medical stockpile in the United States would be the current inventory on hand and what the public or private sector has stockpiled for its own limited audience.

Perhaps there are exceptions for certain medications, but requiring 6-12 month stockpiles of certain medications tastes of corporatism.


It is a race between the incubation time (between 2 and 21 days) and the rate of transmission, including how long the virus can live in the air (huge difference between just a few seconds and a few hours) and where it is discovered. If it gets to a major airport we may be fucked.

Also such a huge mutation may lower the deadliness of the illness.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: