Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Google has Google Groups which interfaces with usenet. Also, the nature of "waves" doesn't fit with threaded communication model of usenet. It can be made to work, but you'd need many waves/wavelets to accomplish that, and going back and editing previous stuffs would create a confusing set of messages on Usenet. Would you post those to usenet? Post it by replying with a diff? It'd require a very different model. Far easier to integrate standard web forums with usenet (which I, personally, think would be awesome) than what Wave had. It was really designed around a collaborative document model. Would've been awesome if the invite system hadn't been so clunky, and the year delay between announcement and when my friends finally got access just killed any momentum at the time (for me).


> Google has Google Groups which interfaces with usenet.

Yeah, for a typical Google idea of interfacing -- you can't get Google groups as usenet, but you can get usenet as Google groups (the web front-end).


True. I guess my point was:

1) They have an interface to usenet so an interface via Wave wasn't (strictly speaking) necessary.

2) Such an interface could have been added later via gadgets and bots, rather than one singular hardcoded method.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: