Yes, but Intel may "fix" the license by just making it proprietary like most of their other development tools. IMO the worst part about the Cilk++ license is that I just don't understand it. (I suppose if I actually used Cilk++ I could ask them for a clarification.)
Sometimes I think it's too bad that the Open Source Definition pretty much marginalized any innovation in open source licensing; OTOH most licensing "innovation" is evil anyway.
