Uh, thanks for pointing to this. I found an article detailing this a bit more[1]. This is a inaccuracy that is quite telling about the quality of research this author is going to offer.
That's astonishing. Caught in a lie, he first denies it, then backpedals and immediately blames someone else who is clearly not at fault. My already-low opinion of him is now even lower.
1 http://www.businessweek.com/finance/occupy-wall-street/archi...