He talks about all his behavior alleles (?) but gives us no idea of a baseline in the general population.
He talks about how his brain has this same scan as a psychopath, but doesn't tell us how many people have this same scan in the general population.
It is all glossed over for a good talk.
This science has now evolved into books. I saw him on NOVA originally. Who would know who he is outside his academia world, if not for this silly discovery ?
This is such poor science. I'd question if having him look over a stack of brain scans to find correlations with certain behaviors to be of value. Seems like you'd be better off finding some layperson, teach them how to read these heat map type things and let them find the correlations. Like A/B testing for the brain. Then you don't have all these biases leading to book deals. chuckle.
He talks about how his brain has this same scan as a psychopath, but doesn't tell us how many people have this same scan in the general population.
It is all glossed over for a good talk.
This science has now evolved into books. I saw him on NOVA originally. Who would know who he is outside his academia world, if not for this silly discovery ?
This is such poor science. I'd question if having him look over a stack of brain scans to find correlations with certain behaviors to be of value. Seems like you'd be better off finding some layperson, teach them how to read these heat map type things and let them find the correlations. Like A/B testing for the brain. Then you don't have all these biases leading to book deals. chuckle.