> *We can and should leave the protocol alone.* Nobody, not in the article and n... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		y0ghur7_xxx on Nov 23, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Namecoin, A Replacement For SSL > We can and should leave the protocol alone. Nobody, not in the article and not in the post you replied to, sad that the protocol needs to be replaced. In fact, both say the exact opposite. I like your posts, and you clearly know what you are talking about, but this time it seems you don't discuss the article, but just hop in the discussion with random and not correlated, but true facts.

tptacek on Nov 23, 2013 [–]

I'm including the CA system in my definition of "the protocol".

y0ghur7_xxx on Nov 23, 2013 | [–]

> I'm including the CA system in my definition of "the protocol".

Well then, TACK changes "the protocol". As you know better than me it proposes changes to the TLS handshake and how CAs are verified.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact