Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is a paraphrasing by the article's authors. It is their take on the document.

Fortunately the article includes a link to a copy of the document. Published on documentcloud with a crappy user-interface it is a PITA to read it and I can't find a link to download as a PDF either. But at least you still have the option to read the original source yourself.



Viewing it on DocumentCloud provides a link to the PDF https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/8383...


How did you get from the NYT inline widget to the PDF file? I didn't see any links from the NYT page to documentcloud itself -- the only reason I even knew it was documentcloud was because I had to whitelist it in RequestPolicy.


No idea what "RequestPolicy" is but the widget has DocumentCloud's name/logo (which links to their homepage), searching DocumentCloud for the title of the document SIGINT strategy[1] yields this as the first result and when you view it on DocumentCloud[2] (as opposed to the widget) it includes a link to the PDF.

[1] https://www.documentcloud.org/public/search/SIGINT%20strateg...

[2] https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/838324-2012-2016-sig...


It's actually a 'summation'. The context is far stronger than a simple re-wording (or paraphrase in the ordinary sense). I agree it begs for a deeper review of the original source. The lead in reads: Written as an agency mission statement with broad goals, the five-page document said that...

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/summation




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: