Appologies for the spelling errors in this note below - it's an OCR of an old printout (I've been unable to find a current archive of cypherpunks going back this far):
Cypherpunks archive-96.02.29-96.03.06: List of reliable remailers
List of reliable remailers
Anonymous Remail Service (nobody@vegas.gateway.com) Sun, 3 Mar 199609:18:03-0500
( Messages sorted by: [date][ threa4][ subject][ author]
( Next message: Adam Shostack: "Re: NYT on Crypto Bills"
( Previous message: Raph Levien: "List of reliable remailers"
( Next in thread: Black Unicorn: "Re: your mail"
Thought that this was worth reposting:
>1 attended last weeks "Information, National Policies; and International
>Infrastructure" Symposium at Harvard Law School, organized by the Global
>Information Infrastructure Commission, the Kennedy School and the
>Institute for Information Technology Law & Policy of Harvard Law School.
>During the presentation by Paul Strassmann, National Defense University
>and William Marlow, Science Applications International Corporation,
>entitled 'Anonymous Remailers as Risk-Free International Infoterrorists"
>the questions was raised from audience (Professor Chaarles Nesson,
>Harvard LAw School) - in a rather extended debate - whether the CIA and
>similar government agencies are involved in running anonymous remailers
>as this would be a perfect target to scan possibly illegal messages.
>Both presenters explicitly acknowledged that a number of anonymous
>remailers in the US are run by government agencies scanning traffic.
>Marlow said that the government runs at least a dozen remailers and that
>the most popular remailers in France and Germany are run by the
>respective government agencies in these countries In addition they
>mentioned that the NSA has successfully developed Systems to break
>encrypted messages below 1000 bit of key length and strongly suggested
>to use at least 1024 bit keys. They said that they themselves use 1024
>bit keys.
>J ask Marlos afterwards if these comments were off or on record, he
>paused then said that he can be quoted.
>So I thought I pass that on. ft seems interesting enough, don 't you
> think?
>Best
> Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger
>Information Law Project
>Austrian Institute for Legal Policy
Groundfog@alpha.c2.org
( Next message: Adam Shostack: "Re: NYT on Crypto Bills"
( Previous message: Raph Levien: "List of reliable remailers"
( Next in thread: Black Unicorn: "Re: your mail"
Cypherpunks archive-96.02.29-96.03.06: List of reliable remailers
List of reliable remailers Anonymous Remail Service (nobody@vegas.gateway.com) Sun, 3 Mar 199609:18:03-0500
( Messages sorted by: [date][ threa4][ subject][ author] ( Next message: Adam Shostack: "Re: NYT on Crypto Bills" ( Previous message: Raph Levien: "List of reliable remailers" ( Next in thread: Black Unicorn: "Re: your mail"
Thought that this was worth reposting:
>1 attended last weeks "Information, National Policies; and International >Infrastructure" Symposium at Harvard Law School, organized by the Global >Information Infrastructure Commission, the Kennedy School and the >Institute for Information Technology Law & Policy of Harvard Law School.
>During the presentation by Paul Strassmann, National Defense University >and William Marlow, Science Applications International Corporation, >entitled 'Anonymous Remailers as Risk-Free International Infoterrorists" >the questions was raised from audience (Professor Chaarles Nesson, >Harvard LAw School) - in a rather extended debate - whether the CIA and >similar government agencies are involved in running anonymous remailers >as this would be a perfect target to scan possibly illegal messages.
>Both presenters explicitly acknowledged that a number of anonymous >remailers in the US are run by government agencies scanning traffic. >Marlow said that the government runs at least a dozen remailers and that >the most popular remailers in France and Germany are run by the >respective government agencies in these countries In addition they >mentioned that the NSA has successfully developed Systems to break >encrypted messages below 1000 bit of key length and strongly suggested >to use at least 1024 bit keys. They said that they themselves use 1024 >bit keys.
>J ask Marlos afterwards if these comments were off or on record, he >paused then said that he can be quoted.
>So I thought I pass that on. ft seems interesting enough, don 't you > think?
>Best
> Viktor Mayer-Schoenberger >Information Law Project >Austrian Institute for Legal Policy
Groundfog@alpha.c2.org
( Next message: Adam Shostack: "Re: NYT on Crypto Bills" ( Previous message: Raph Levien: "List of reliable remailers" ( Next in thread: Black Unicorn: "Re: your mail"
I of 1 05.09.96 01:58