"If you have a house, then it's your responsibility to have doors with locks and windows which are closed."
Legally, it isn't.
"You cannot have a house in a public space accessible worldwide, without doors or windows, and then randomly get to decide who can and can't visit, and have it enforced by courts.
"
Completely and totally false.
Trespass to land, in fact, doesn't even require that you intend to trespass, only that you voluntarily traveled to the location. You do not need to know it's someone else's property or that you are trespassing to be liable.
Getting injunctive relief is more difficult for other reasons, but you would at least get nominal damages.
I think you will find trespass to land doctrines are not in your favor in this argument. You may want to try to argue it isn't like land at all :)
Legally, it isn't.
"You cannot have a house in a public space accessible worldwide, without doors or windows, and then randomly get to decide who can and can't visit, and have it enforced by courts. "
Completely and totally false. Trespass to land, in fact, doesn't even require that you intend to trespass, only that you voluntarily traveled to the location. You do not need to know it's someone else's property or that you are trespassing to be liable.
Getting injunctive relief is more difficult for other reasons, but you would at least get nominal damages.
I think you will find trespass to land doctrines are not in your favor in this argument. You may want to try to argue it isn't like land at all :)