The post I was replying to is largely correct. Criminals don't have suppressors ... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		rdouble on April 20, 2013 \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Richard Stallman response to Boston Police efforts The post I was replying to is largely correct. Criminals don't have suppressors because there is no secondary market for suppressors due to regulation. That said, I would guess they wouldn't need or use them even if they were available.

icelancer on April 20, 2013 [–]

Criminals don't have suppressors because they are a novelty and any gun-owner understands this.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact