Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

you probably also don't want to run a DB on non-raid disk. I believe the ec2 instances have non-mirrored disk, I mean, if you are not using ebs. (if you don't care about the data, use something with more ram, and mount the disk async. Ram is going to be faster than disk, always.)


The problem is that DB application will try to sync disk either via fsync or o_direct. EBS may have a very long latency for such kind access.


I'm just pointing out that you don't want to run your db on non-redundant disk. Really, I think in-ram, redundant databases like MySQL cluster are more suited to the 'cloud' - especially as you can get cheap ram.

Just looking at the bonnie results, ebs wasn't that far off everything else in terms of sequential access.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: