Isn't this more the arena of a procedural than federal law? This definitely seems more feel good than reality. I believe the court precedent is called "legislative entrenchment"[1] which seems to prevent Congress from passing these laws that "bind" future Congresses.
So, to answer the Representative's question, it would appear that courts would hold this bill unconstitutional.
So, to answer the Representative's question, it would appear that courts would hold this bill unconstitutional.
[1] http://www.yalelawjournal.org/the-yale-law-journal/essay/leg...