I would suggest that what we are missing is credible
Agreed plans to minimise the downside costs
Perhaps these exist, but I would like to see seni-contractural agreements between the regulator and each frakker piblically available with defined milestones so we can be reasonably assured that the damaged being caused is going to be dealt with and done so to a piblically decent timescale
(Yes this is partly what regulators do anyway, but the important part is the transparency - cos we have no expectations regulators are independent of industry)
Perhaps these exist, but I would like to see seni-contractural agreements between the regulator and each frakker piblically available with defined milestones so we can be reasonably assured that the damaged being caused is going to be dealt with and done so to a piblically decent timescale
(Yes this is partly what regulators do anyway, but the important part is the transparency - cos we have no expectations regulators are independent of industry)