It's really unfortunate that the link you referenced contained too many wrong understandings and misrepresentations. A little research can make the following clear:
1. Bitcoinica was a regulated financial service provider before closing down.
2. I sold 100% of it in October 2011, ~5 months before the first breach.
3. There has been no conclusive evidence about the last hack.
4. I was not a defendant of the said lawsuit. I have not provided any defence regarding the lawsuit.
You're a credible person, but I hope you have credible sources to post here.
I have tried my best to discountinue my involvement on Bitcoin projects while keeping supporting the currency. I'm genuinely creating value through startups and you should be able to see this through my effort in NameTerrific.
I do not understand why anyone would use an account created 9 hours ago and named as a variant of my legal name to criticize me personally without conclusive evidence, other than in an attempt to destroy the reputation of an 18-year-old entrepreneur, who is also a victim of the mis-management of his former startup after acquisition.
EDIT: I'm open to any discussions about your opinions and ideas. Feel free to email me (email in my profile).
1. Bitcoinica was a regulated financial service provider before closing down.
2. I sold 100% of it in October 2011, ~5 months before the first breach.
3. There has been no conclusive evidence about the last hack.
4. I was not a defendant of the said lawsuit. I have not provided any defence regarding the lawsuit.
You're a credible person, but I hope you have credible sources to post here.
I have tried my best to discountinue my involvement on Bitcoin projects while keeping supporting the currency. I'm genuinely creating value through startups and you should be able to see this through my effort in NameTerrific.