Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Is it wrong that I have no problems with non-vaginal ultrasound requirements?

In my book, abortion carries more moral importance than, say, clipping a toenail. Partial-birth abortions, while rare, were barbarous. I understand state populations that want to have waiting periods and such things.

Ideally, society should offer support and education such that fewer abortions occur.



The same people who say they hate abortions are also opposed to subsidizing contraception.

And it makes no sense. Unless you're ideologically opposed to any sort of government subsidy, contraception has got to have the best return on a per-dollar basis.


True, like Charmaine Yoest:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/magazine/charmaine-yoests-...;

And when the interviewer pointed out there was a 60-80% drop in the abortion rate (compared to the nat'l average) among women in St. Louis who received free contraception for three years, Yoest refused to discuss it, calling it a "red herring."

These activists can say "life begins at conception" til they're blue in the face, but every major medical organization defines pregnancy as the implantation of the fertilized egg in the uterus. Why do we need more unwanted children in this country when it's so preventable?


It makes plenty of sense if your religion opposes both.


> Ideally, society should offer support and education such that fewer abortions occur.

Like making birth control available? That and real sex education help a lot.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: