Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What course of action would you have suggested?




Not have to do it in the first place because of automated controls and fail-safes?

Sure, but in this case, those don't have exist and you need to make a tough choice, so which is it?

Not having fail-safes is the issue itself.

So smart, do you not understand the question? Don't answer if you can't, instead of trying to weasel. You're acting like the Spanish politicians now.

As someone who works in the sector, I can say that they're right.

You are answering all my comments with dismissing my points. Are you angry at them? Feel that your party threatened by them?

You are acting like a good politician servant. I am bringing facts to the conversation while you try to derail it.


Huh? I'm answering to a whole lot of comments, not just yours, you're not special ;)

I'm not angry at you or your comments, I'm mad about misinformation and opinion-pieces lacking nuance though, that I can confess. I have no party, I purposefully don't vote in the nationwide elections, only in local elections.

Anything else you'd like to know about me? Or we're good-to-go for second date already?


You have no party but have a narrative pro-current government, while the corruption in Adif is at the worst level of history in Spain. Bravo!

The usual fail-safe is actually a derailment mechanism.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: