Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

But CBD does not need heat to convert.

I have a hypothesis that taking cannabis (and especially CBD) out of our food chain may be contributing to the increase¹ in prevalence of chronic pain.

¹ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12588185/?utm_sourc...



When was cannabis ever in the human food chain?


Livestock used to eat cannabis back when it was a weed.


While not being cannabis, breast milk contains endocannabinoids.


THC comes in a plant in the THCa form. CBD comes in CBDa form.

Both are not bioactive by default in their natural form.


All I'll say is go spend a day picking hops without gloves.

There are a large number of cannabinoids at play, some clearly (as in observably and demonstrably) are bioactive in their natural, unheated form.

---

None of which is said to endorse the other theory. Just to point out that claiming heat is required is incorrect.


The farm bill makes 'hemp' anything with below 0.3% THC legal. For this reason, we have a LOT of testing on the THC content of cannabis, since it is required to sell and manufacture. As it turns out, naturally cannabis quite commonly has >0.3% THC even before heating or activation of THCa.

Any human-like animal with our receptors eating a large amount would get high as fuck, cooked or not. A ruminant eating pounds of the stuff raw, would not be that different from a human consuming an ounce of baked pot.


This was killed in the recent budget bill: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/13/congress-thc-hemp-ban.html


Both degrade into actives over time or exposure to air/sun/warmth, and then into CBN, which is itself active.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: