Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I now live in Amsterdam but also used a bike when I lived in the US and the difference is night and day. Sure, the inner part of Amsterdam doesn't have as many bike lanes, mainly because it was designed 500 years ago, but there are always biking lanes around on roads with higher speeds.

Even so, I agree that the main difference is that every car takes bikers into account. In the US either people simply don't check their mirrors for bikes or even if they do you can't count on them to give you the right of way. And I've had to swerve into traffic several times when a parked car opened the door and nearly hit me, people are simply not trained to look in their mirror before opening their door.



>simply not trained . . .

Which is something I've never understood, personally.

Granted I'm a bit more concerned with another car flying through and ripping my door off; but you bet I'm worried about traffic when I open my door.

No matter how you assess the situation, there is no excuse for such carelessness.

Why would anyone risk human lives [possibly your own] and personal property in such a fashion? ---

Based on your time in Amsterdam, would you say drivers there are more _patient_ with cyclists?

I've often held the sentiment that a large number of US accidents are simply a result of impatience. The way people handle switching lanes, controlled intersections, merging, etc. in the US has always seemed rather "selfish" to me.

As an example: it always seems that drivers here in the states, when switching lanes, would rather overtake than undertake, even when undertaking is clearly the safer option (e.g: less traffic behind the car in question, little or no traffic behind you but considerable traffic in front of you).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: