Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"The government" needs time to fix this and until then, we need to not automate everyone out of a job. If that means we don't "get to the future" until then, fine. "Fault" or not, the AI companies are putting people in danger now and unless we can implement a more proper solution extremely quickly, they just have to put up with being slowed down.

But it's not like "the government" (as if there is just one) simply doesn't want to fix things. There are many people who want to fix the way we distribute resources, but there are others who are working to stop them. The various millionaires behind these AI companies are part of the reason why the problem you identified exists in the first place.



So your government should pump the brakes, while other governments rush towards ASI. And you believe this will benefit you, long term? Or do you believe in “global cooperation”?


This is exactly why I put "the government" in quotes. The parent post was saying "the government" should just fix the underlying problem instead of showing AI progress. This has the same problem - no government can do that alone.

So it's either "we all science ourselves out of a job and die from uncontrolled capitalism" or "we try to do something about the uncontrolled capitalism and in the meantime, everyone else keeps sciencing everyone out of a job". The result is the same, but some of us at least tried to do something about it.


Not necessarily. You can also attempt to disconnect your economy from AI-driven economies. Yes, tariffs. :-)

That path is hard and risky (are AI countries eclipsing us in military power?), but probably more realistic than hoping for global cooperation.


So basically being Amish


If all of the economy were to be AI-driven except your lone village, then yes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: