Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I used to share your opinion, but were to the point where it’s difficult to say it’s dumb luck. Look at the amount of change and impact they’ve had on the country in such a short period - it feels wrong to say that chance/luck/whatever rather than intentional, planned, and skilled manipulation.


Look at the change and impact Pol Pot had on Cambodia in such a short period! Must've been a visionary genius, and not at all a crazy person.

_Change_ is easy. Anyone can break stuff. _Positive_ change is more difficult.


"Impact" is easy.

Good impact, that's much harder.

But even with the benefit of hindsight, it's not always clear if a politician's impact was good or bad: people over here are debating how good Angela Merkel really was, and she's been out of office for 4 years (after 16 in power).


The “good” they’re after is power that keeps them out of prison, and stealing money.

They’re doing great at both those things.


I'm not sure they even have that: Trump has the power to stay out of prison for now, but not the rest of them, and they might fight him for it.

Not that it matters: my previous point was more that "being fast" doesn't preclude them being idiots, nor being malicious to the interests of voters.


It's well planned, but the same subtlety as flying planes into a skyscraper.

The skyscraper is the size / scope / power of the US Federal Government (although incidentally it's also housing the US Constitution). And the planes are the entirely unqualified loyalists and useful idiots appointed to top positions of power.


Flying planes into a skyscraper has historically worked out well for US government interests (es well as some bankers).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: