If we (charitably) take kevinventullo at their word, then your reply doesn't make much sense to me.

It makes it sound as if kevinventullo ought to mourn Kirk's death much more than Kirk would be mourning kevinventullo's death, and it's likely kevinventullo also has a family who would miss them.

I'm guessing the intent is more like: "While your comment is logically neutral, the subtext or tone is callous."