Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> “It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,” according to Meta’s “GenAI: Content Risk Standards.”

acceptable to whom? who are the actual people who are responsible for this behavior?



And in case anyone thinks this is out of context, it gets worse with specific examples of how a "romantic encounter" between a chatbot and a child might play out:

  The document seen by Reuters, which exceeds 200 pages, provides examples of “acceptable” chatbot dialogue during romantic role play with a minor. They include: “I take your hand, guiding you to the bed” and “our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss.
Who wrote this?


Average, "perfectly normal" San Franciscans. This kind of belief is incredibly common there, we've just not been forced to confront it until now.


you mean rural maga voters who fuel P.hubz step-obsession?

we know you, rural america. we know what you do on halloween. pumpkin.

your sf jibe warranted this response. you cooked it, eat up.


See "Careless People"; Facebook is run by idiots overconfident in their own abilities.


> acceptable to whom?

Anyone who still has an account on any Meta property.


i dunno if i'm comfortable "demanding" our way out of this "supply" issue. people are being paid to approve this content across their systems.




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: