Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

There needs to be some terms clarified. mygov vs mygovid vs myid.

Agreed, "myid" used to be called "mygovid".

But myid/mygovid is NOT mygov. I'm guessing the rename is likely because of that confusion.

mygov usage is high, 26 million accounts, according to [1] 2023 report.

Myid usage seems middling. 13 million according to [2] 2024 article.

Which platform to use for what and how I leave to you.

I don't want this. I don't want the government's aim for auditable provability of every item watched/interacted with in the name of "won't somebody think of the children!!!" level of authoritarianism.

There are plenty of households without kids. Why are they having to pay a privacy price?

[0] https://my.gov.au/en/about/help/digital-id

[1] https://my.gov.au/content/dam/mygov/documents/audit/response...

[2] https://www.ato.gov.au/media-centre/mygovid-being-renamed-my...



I agree the naming is a mess. There is the Australian Digital ID system (https://www.digitalidsystem.gov.au/how-the-system-works) which allows third party providers.

Whatever the capabilities of the Australian government ID services, there is a way to issue privacy-preserving tokens that could do all the things you'd need without being trackable the system was properly designed. (I have not studied the protocols of the Digital ID spec to say whether that's the case).


I agree with you that technically it can be done. Which is why I said:

"I don't want the government's aim for auditable provability"

I mean, technically they could do it and provide at least a modicum of privacy protection. But I will bet they won't because whoever is implementing it will want to be able to point to specifics - specific people, specific times, specific places - so they can cover their arse come the next moral panic moment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: