tesla is making millions of cars with the capability of driving themselves. conservatively imagine the cars make 2k a month. each 1 million cars could then make 24 billion per year
Even at insane growth multiples there's plenty of high/mega caps on the SP500 that will never, ever return investors the money that simple bonds will, you're paying way too much for way too little (future) cash flows and book.
There's many companies that have their revenues flat or falling from quite some time which are still priced for insane future growth. Go figure.
Well the problem there is that you don’t know which companies will pay better than bonds and which ones won’t.
Haven’t run the numbers, but I assume that you could take the S&P 500 over whatever timeframe you want, remove all the stocks that didn’t outperform bonds, and be left with a basket of stocks that wildly outperforms the actual S&P 500.
Tesla's stock price has always seemed completely irrational to me. Tesla's market cap is over double Toyota, BMW, Mercedes, VW, GM, and Ford combined. All while selling far fewer cars then any of those manufacturers.
For this market cap to make sense, Tesla would have to eventually become the dominant car manufacturer worldwide. And that just doesn't seem like a reasonable prediction, given that legacy car manufacturers are starting to figure out EVs, and newer EV-focused manufacturers are making huge strides.
I don't know when (or even if) Tesla's stock price will fall back down to Earth. The old saying is that the market can remain irrational longer then you can remain solvent. But I do know that Tesla's stock price is not a good indicator of how well they're doing as a car manufacturer.
The car company may not be selling vehicles but it has around ten invite-only self-driving manned robotaxis in a single US city that was possibly mapped separately before launch, so it's obviously worth a lot of money.
That's 1) buying the dip and 2) beating the estimate. TSLA has always been about the personality of a car salesman more than anything, so this isn't a surprise.
Assuming "the market" to act "rational" (which can be questioned to some degree in that case - there is hype and the Musk-Factor ..) the driver is that the news may still be better than the prediction: If everybody two days ago assumed a decline of sales by 30% the stocks dropped back then, then real numbers come and decline is "only" 14% they raise again as the bad news are still better than assumed.