You'd have to first properly define 'vaccine' objectively.

Opposition occurs because of negative outcomes, and adverse risks where existing establishment incentivizes deception.

Taking the opposite of your argument, is there any level of transparency possible where you would accept a vaccine for a disease that won't kill you, where taking that vaccine may sterilize you, or debilitate you. Is opposition the point? Opposition to what exactly?

Please be specific so we can know what you mean.