Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

More like, these guys will be focused on parting VCs from their money.

Datacenters in space makes no sense at all. Even ignoring the huge cost of sending hardware there in the first place, cooling is a massive issue in space. No medium to sink heat into means the only way to cool anything is by running water through giant infrared radiators. Not ideal when cooling is the largest bottleneck in scaling datacenters. Note that they would also have to dissipate the large amounts heat their datacenter satellite gets from being exposed to the Sun.

Also disregard the cost it takes to send a technician for maintenance, of updating hardware, etc.



> Also disregard the cost it takes to send a technician for maintenance, of updating hardware, etc.

This won't happen. If a satellite fails they will just write it off. Maintenance would be more expensive than depreciation


They’re proposing a multi-kilometer sized satellite, though. That’s more akin to demolishing an entire datacenter when something important fails.


How is it even feasible to build that?


Interesting. I was assuming that cooling is basically a non-issue in space. I'll need to read up on that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: