> MDN disagrees. See the huge red warning here https://developer.mozilla.org/en-... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		koakuma-chan 9 months ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: You might not need WebSockets > MDN disagrees. See the huge red warning here https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/EventSource It should say "When used over HTTP/1" instead of "When not used over HTTP/2" because nowadays we also have HTTP/3, and browsers barely even use HTTP/1, so I would say it's pretty safe to ignore that warning. > Unless you mean on HTTP2? Any version of HTTP that supports multiplexing. > But aren't WS connections also multiplexed over HTTP2 in that case? There is RFC 8441 but I don't think it's actually implemented in the browsers.

kaoD 9 months ago [–]

> There is RFC 8441 but I don't think it's actually implemented in the browsers.

Found this: https://github.com/mattermost/mattermost/issues/30285

koakuma-chan 9 months ago | [–]

https://chromestatus.com/feature/6251293127475200

It looks like it's supported in Chrome and Firefox but not in Safari.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact