Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Or was it the gradual phasing out of mainframe-class hardware in favour of PC-compatible servers

Proprietary Unix is still around. Solaris, HP-UX and AIX still make money for their owners and there are lots of places running those on brand-new metal. You are right, however, that Linux displaced most of the proprietary Unixes, as well as Windows and whatever was left of the minicomputer business that wasn't first killed by the unixes. I'm not sure when exactly people started talking about "Enterprise Linux".



Redhat was doing enterprise Linux well before IBM was involved. It was the rational platform for non-legacy .com 1.0 businesses.


> 1998: Many major companies such as IBM, Compaq and Oracle announce their support for Linux.

-- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Linux

It was all about Solaris, AIX and HP-UX for .com businesses.

I was there, our Linux deployements were only used internally, we never sold those workloads as UNIX targets on our product.


Back then I went with Debian, but I agree - the early scale-out crowd went mostly with Red Hat. Back then there was a lot of companies still doing scale-up with more exotic hardware with OSs like AIX and Solaris.


nope.

the first enterprise Linux was SuSE on s390, then came RH on x86 and then suse there as well. but RH marketing was better back then already :-D


I first remember the term when Oracle ported themselves to Linux, began submitting patches, then began pushing Oracle on Linux to enterprises.

Oracle's big reason for doing so was because they could charge more for Oracle on Linux, and still get to a lower total cost of ownership than Oracle on Solaris.

Oracle began this in 1998. By 2006 they had their own Oracle Enterprise Linux distribution.


> By 2006 they had their own Oracle Enterprise Linux distribution.

By putting their name on Red Hat’s hard work and reputation.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: