Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Losing 20% of global revenue is not really an option.


Losing 20% of global revenue while also losing 20% of global COGS is a much better option than losing 10% of revenue and incurring an extra 10% of R&D.


How would disabling certain features in certain markets hostile to their business model result in 20% revenue loss?


I realise this wasn't your point, but there is something deeply dystopian about referring to the EU's attempt to act in the best interests of its citizens as "hostile to [Apple's] business model."


Because less people would buy Apple devices.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: