> Chefs actually are subject to being tasted before hire. It doesn’t happen in a 1hr interview
Exactly. What you're describing is more closer to doing a take home and then explaining it.
> Doctors go through excessive amounts if additional schooling and board certification to prove they know how to e.g. cut open a body.
So not part of the interview? It's not like there aren't certification in the industry, e.g. AWS, Microsoft, Java, etc etc.
> Maybe you’re asking for the software industry to become more formalized in skillset requirements? Or maybe engineers should bring their portfolio instead?
I doubt "formalization" helps (see above, some of it exists and those are off the mark just as well). In essence leet code is the "formalized" requirement. It's just a bad 1.
I'm asking to come back to common sense.
Again, doctors don't cut open a body live as part of the interview. So even if I have my AWS certifications (equivalent of your example) the interviewer will and still does ask me to do a live system design interview. How is that the same?
Exactly. What you're describing is more closer to doing a take home and then explaining it.
> Doctors go through excessive amounts if additional schooling and board certification to prove they know how to e.g. cut open a body.
So not part of the interview? It's not like there aren't certification in the industry, e.g. AWS, Microsoft, Java, etc etc.
> Maybe you’re asking for the software industry to become more formalized in skillset requirements? Or maybe engineers should bring their portfolio instead?
I doubt "formalization" helps (see above, some of it exists and those are off the mark just as well). In essence leet code is the "formalized" requirement. It's just a bad 1.
I'm asking to come back to common sense.
Again, doctors don't cut open a body live as part of the interview. So even if I have my AWS certifications (equivalent of your example) the interviewer will and still does ask me to do a live system design interview. How is that the same?