Absolutely! It certainly depends on the metrics you care about. If you want to freeze fast motion, a camera is your best bet. But if you want to see high contrast areas (e.g. looking outside a window from a dark room), you've got a HUGE leg up on cameras. For example, high-end cameras tend to feature maybe 15 stops of dynamic range, while humans eyes can manage up to 24 stops (a "stop" is a doubling or halving of light values.)

Additionally, the human eye has a resolution of approximately 576 MP. This is one reason why we can often see details in the distance that disappear in a photo.

Finally, while it's arguably not "better," the brain processes images very differently. This is another reason why the image you take often looks "worse" than what you saw in person, or why you can't get the colors to look "quite right", etc. If you get into photography, you start to "see" the things your eye was previously rewriting for you (like a green color cast on skin when you're in the forest) - but it's not the natural way your brain process information.

You can also look up estimates on the processing rate of human's sensory system - it's quite impressive.

Less related, but things like this are interesting too: https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=17970

Human eye's resolution is not uniformly distributed though, and AIs are not limited to just two eyes.

That's fair. Dynamic range limitations can also be overcome with additional cameras.