Perhaps there's an inherent conflict between using the forest as a source of resources for the nearby village, and using it as a storage space for tigers.
That same forest without the cameras didn't exhibit that particular kind of conflict. I suppose the problem is in behavior of particular humans here, not of tigers, the forest, or even the cameras.
Is a national park. Of course that it should have endangered animals taking refuge there. To protect valuable and unique ecosystems is the main purpose of those areas.
If this seems stressing, maybe we need to remind that on Africa the directors of some national parks need constant protection from the army to avoid being assassinated by poachers. In some places intruders found on protected sanctuaries are not recorded with drones, after many rangers killed, they are directly shoot until they quit the area.
