Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Four chars too long, though.

And it's "Section 230", if you were not parsing the integer value in the title.



They know, they are the one who submitted the article to HN. I believe they were posting the comment just to denote that they had to change it.

The following preserves all info under the title limit: NYT Gets 230 Wrong Again; Misrepresenting History, Law, And The 1st Amendment

> NY Times Gets 230 Wrong Again; Misrepresenting History, Law, And The First Amendment


I get that. It was more directed at the dork that downvoted the comment, to let them know why OP might have elaborated.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: