Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The software side is not OSS, it's no better than the alternatives.

Yet another KVM that cannot be trusted.



Is this not the software side?

https://github.com/sipeed/NanoKVM

Link copied from another comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41432060


I was mistaken it seems. Only the front end is open ATM.

> the backend will be open-sourced soon (after the GitHub repository reaches 2K stars).

https://en.wiki.sipeed.com/hardware/en/kvm/NanoKVM/system/in...


Looking forward to the open sourced code. When and if it gets out, this KVM will become a workable solution.


Heh Heh Heh

Wonder if they're serious about that?

Do they know places are around (or at least used to be) which will inflate the # of stars for a repo for some minimal amount of cash? Like $20 per thousand(?) or so when I was reading an expose about that years ago... ;)


A closed source $30 external network KVM is less expensive (and less featureful) than closed source onboard IPMI which typically increases board price by $100-$200.

I think there are some open source IPMI products, but that involves talking to an ODM about a run of thousands of boards which is a bit much for me; I just want two servers at home. I'm tempted by the Gigabyte MC12-LE0 boards that are low cost in Germany right now, but getting dedicated server boards disrupts my pattern of upgrade a desktop, and give the old board to my oldest server.


I guess the best choice would be something built on Raspberry Pi? Like PiKVM, or TinyPilot (both frequently discussed on HN)?


I've been interested in (but haven't yet tried) the BliKVM devices that are a for of PiKVM but are on a PCIeb card to put the device in the server. First generation from them used Pis the second switched to some other Linux SoC.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: