Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah… this was a pretty obvious power grab by a bunch of unelected bureaucrats. Sure, it’s popular, but what comes next?


It was giving power back to employees over clauses that are absurd and should not be enforceable.


Getting rid of non-compete agreements is just allowing American workers have jobs without ridiculous demands from their employers that they abandon their entire livelihoods for a decade after working for them for a few months.

Non-compete agreements are extraordinarily anti-worker, and fundamentally anti-free-market. If you leave your job, you should be allowed to find another similar job without your former employer suing you for having a career.

>What comes next?

Actual workers rights in America, hopefully.


It’s always a “power grab” when giving rights to workers. But it’s “free market” when removing workers rights.


There seems to be ever increasing talk about communism vs capitalism, free markets, competition, etc.

I think more and more people are asking "what has the 'free market' done for me lately", and are open to other ideas. It's a dangerous road. I see it a bit like the "defund the police" movement, people admit that police are good in theory, but the reality is a lot of people believe the police will never actually do anything to help them, thus, they want tear most of the system down and start over. Likewise, everyone agrees a free market with competition is great, but they see that the people upholding our "free market" do a lot non-free-market things which will never benefit regular people.

What does it mean when the things that happen in a healthy free market aren't happening?


> It's a dangerous road

To be clear, there are exactly 0 communist politicians in the US.

You're creating a false dichotomy. It's not the capitalists vs the communists, it's the capitalists vs the slight less capitalist capitalists. The American left isn't communist, and it isn't even close. Even the closest politicians like Bernie Sanders cannot be considered communists.

> What does it mean when the things that happen in a healthy free market aren't happening

It means we don't live in a free market. Because a free market is bad, and nobody actually wants a free market. They want an almost free market. But of course child labor is bad, and poisoning your workers is bad, and also blowing them up on the railroad is bad, and then poisoning the water is bad too. And then giving your customers HIV (yes, real) is bad as well.

So we decided we need some authority over that.


Nothing about it is obvious to me. Care to justify your statement?


A more perfect union?


The unelected bureaucrats of the US Department of Defense control a lot of money, I'm expecting more lawsuits from the parties who don't get as much of that money as they want.


> unelected bureaucrats

no different than the unelected judge who issued the ruling


> Yeah… this was a pretty obvious power grab by a bunch of unelected bureaucrats.

The judicial takeover here (and more broadly in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo) was performed by unelected bureaucrats with lifetime tenure.


Reasonable wages? Competition in the markets? Fair compensation?


I’m shivering in terror at the thought.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: