Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

On the other hand, 2.5kW of light is not outrageous. It’s not drastically higher than some of the larger theatrical lights. (Not that being in a spotlight is pleasant, but it does not permanently blind the actors.)

A lot of this comes down to wavelength. Some wavelengths get focused by one’s eye and can concentrate their power in a small spot on the retina. Other wavelengths will be absorbed before they get to the retina and will therefore deposit their power over a larger area and in less sensitive tissue.

It can also make a difference if the light is pulsed.



Are you sure that's actually 2.5kW of optical power? Non-scientific lights aren't usually rated by optical power, but by electrical power.


But isn't stage light labeled for consumed power, not emitted power?


that's what i was going to say. and while you can use barn doors and lenses to hone the throw (the size of the beam on stage) -- it's not collimated like a laser is. even with parabolic reflectors like par cans. we're talking magnifying glass and the energy at the focal point (minus what the air absorbs for a given wavelength etc)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: