> If you want to challenge that notion in court, be my guest.
I pointed out that it is, in fact, being challenged. Right now. And has already been several times before, with Tesla settling out of court specifically to prevent any repercussions from a guilty verdict.
If you wanted to talk about successful cases, then that should have been your argument. At this point, you’re just moving the goal posts.
The notion that no Tesla driver got into an accident because the name of the driver assistance program misled them into thinking they could be inattentive while driving has not been challenged in court. That lawsuit doesn't allege that, and if it did, I would wager money it would lose.
> If you want to challenge that notion in court, be my guest.
I pointed out that it is, in fact, being challenged. Right now. And has already been several times before, with Tesla settling out of court specifically to prevent any repercussions from a guilty verdict.
If you wanted to talk about successful cases, then that should have been your argument. At this point, you’re just moving the goal posts.