Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

That would resolve the spying cost, but not the punishment cost. My go-to example here is heroin: class A drug in the UK, 7 years for possession and life for supply, so far as I can see nobody has anything good to say about it, and it has around three times as many users in the UK as the entire UK prison population.

Could implement punishment for that specific crime, at huge cost, but you can't expand that to all crimes. Well, I suppose you could try feudalism mark 2 where most of the population is determined to be criminal and therefore spends their life "having to work of their debt to society", but then you have to find out the hard way why we stopped doing feudalism mark 1.



A computer owned society doesn't really need jails. You can deny 90% of services to a criminal and track and limit their movement digitally.

We are already in the jail.


I think prisoners are usually denied voting rights? Might be wrong about that.

Certainly don't get many travel opportunities.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: