Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Except, you know, all the elementary particles. I have this intrusive thought those are just bits of non-smoothly kinked/knotted spacetime but have neither the physics background or sense where to even start to look further into that.


Maybe what you're looking for is a "geon"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geon_(physics)


>held together in a confined region by the gravitational attraction of its own field energy

Hm, not quite, they'd be held together topologically but the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geometrodynamics is interesting.


>> Yes. GR does it and GR gives good descriptions for a lot of observed phenomena.

>Except, you know, all the elementary particles.

except, you know, all the elementary particles don't do a good job of explaining what GR explains


Hardly an expert, but it seems more likely to me that GR is the smoothed-out limit of a lot of much smaller stuff happening, than QM is somehow low-level wrinkles in an otherwise perfectly smooth spacetime.

I don't think a smooth anything is physically tractable. You need infinite resolution for perfect smoothness - essentially an infinite amount of information at every point.

Except there are no points. So somehow you have equations that define curvature floating in some kind of metaphysical space which somehow gets mapped to observable phenomena.

And if it's a noisy smoothness - where does the noise come from?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: