Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Maybe a good thread to ask:

Does anyone know the term for the tense of speech that I've noticed popping up more and more frequently over the last decade or so? I first noticed it in sports but now it's everywhere.

It's something like stating a what-if as a present fact. Like, instead of saying "If he caught the pass, he could run it in for a touchdown," people say "he gets that pass and he goes all the way in for a touchdown."

I'm actually even struggling to come up with more examples because it's become so commonplace now.

Does anyone know what I'm talking about?



I think it's been around a long time. Maybe you notice it in sports commentary not because it's coming into style, but because it has gone out of style?

Another factor might be that it fits in with how the present tense used to narrate replays. "Jones fakes the post route, gets separation, and the pass goes right over his finger tips. He catches that ball, he's gone!"


Yeah maybe it has been around for a lot longer.

I always wonder if whatever specific speech pattern is really increasing more or I'm just noticing it more and being aware of it.

I think it's probably both-- it's definitely a lot easier to tell with newer slang, etc.


I think using the present tense in sports commentary helps increase the sense of action and immersion for viewers and listeners. It certainly does for me.


In modern casual English it's very common to use present indicative in scenarios you would traditionally use other tenses (perfect or future) or moods (conditional or subjunctive).


Yeah I think this may be it.

"Present indicative instead of conditional" is maybe what I'm talking about?

Kinda like, the speaker is dropping the word "if" from the statement?

Imagine a political commentator saying something like "Trump wins the election, xyz happens, we're in new territory"

Where the "correct" expression is "IF Trump wins the election then xyz could happen and we would be in new territory"

(Not trying to make any sort of political point here, just as an example of what you might hear from a talking head on TV)


That construction is simply dropping an implied "if". It's a rhetorical trick, bordering on dishonest - it's trying to paint a false picture and make something sound weightier or more exciting than it is, by making you think about a hypothetical as if it actually happened when it didn't.


to those who couldn't think of an example, You snooze you lose




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: