Success/victory/accomplishment did.
It's not naive, it's a low level point.
Wrong is often directionless, and pivots and re-maps out a new solution when arbitrary failure arrives.
Right has cropped out the useless pathways, and is stuck between security and looking into the future. The direction of work is non-negotiable.
Wrong is often structured like a flat unlayered map where you fill it out with successes and failures.
Right, often has subjective approval of a layered interpretation, eliminating the need for trial and error.
The thing is, when things go right, it's rapid and easy and it's just business as usual. No one notices.
People crave wrong.
Success/victory/accomplishment did.
It's not naive, it's a low level point.
Wrong is often directionless, and pivots and re-maps out a new solution when arbitrary failure arrives.
Right has cropped out the useless pathways, and is stuck between security and looking into the future. The direction of work is non-negotiable.
Wrong is often structured like a flat unlayered map where you fill it out with successes and failures.
Right, often has subjective approval of a layered interpretation, eliminating the need for trial and error.
The thing is, when things go right, it's rapid and easy and it's just business as usual. No one notices.
People crave wrong.